Many attempts have been made by the house republicans to repeal this law and it ended up in the government being shutdown and obama and harry reed refusing to talk to people about anything to do with the law . this to me doesnt sound like president material refusing to talk to people just because you dont get your way and people want to fix what you messed up.
Repeal efforts
The ACA has been the subject of repeal efforts by Republicans in the 111th, 112th, and 113th Congresses:
Representatives Steve King and Michele Bachmann introduced bills in the House to repeal the ACA the day after it was signed, as did Senator Jim DeMint in the Senate.[362] In 2011, after Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives, one of the first votes held was on a bill entitled “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act” (H.R. 2), which the House passed on a 245–189 vote.[363] All Republicans and 3 Democrats voted for repeal.[364] House Democrats proposed an amendment that repeal not take effect until a majority of the Senators and Representatives had opted out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Republicans voted down the measure.[365] In the Senate, the bill was offered as an amendment to an unrelated bill but was voted down.[366] President Obama had stated that he would have vetoed the bill even if it had passed both chambers of Congress.[367]
Following the 2012 Supreme Court ruling upholding the ACA as constitutional, Republicans held another vote to repeal the law on July 11;[368] the House of Representatives voted with all 239 Republicans and 5 Democrats in favor of repeal—it marked the 31st repeal attempt.[369][370] With President Obama’s reelection and the Democrats expanding their majority in the Senate following the 2012 elections, many Republicans conceded that repeal almost certainly will not occur.[371]
Job consequences of repeal
The House Republican leadership put forth the argument in favor of repeal that “this is a job-killing law, period.”[372] They contended that the ACA would lead to a loss of 650,000 jobs, attributing the figure to a report by the Congressional Budget Office.[372] However, FactCheck noted the 650,000 figure was not included in the CBO report referred to, saying that the Republican statement “badly misrepresents what the Congressional Budget Office has said about the law. In fact, CBO is among those saying the effect [on employment] ‘will probably be small.'”[372] PolitiFact also rated the Republican statement as “False”.[373]
Jonathan Cohn, citing the projections of the CBO, summarized that the primary employment effect of the ACA is to alleviate job lock: “People who are only working because they desperately need employer-sponsored health insurance will no longer do so.”[374] He concluded that the “reform’s only significant employment impact was a reduction in the labor force, primarily because people holding onto jobs just to keep insurance could finally retire” because they have health insurance outside of their jobs.[375]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act